Category Archives: Sociology of Medicine

Dilaudid, Lady Di, and a “Royal Engagement”?

Some may find this post very offensive, so you may want to skip it if you:

  • Are a fan of the British “monarchy”
  • Think very highly of the English “Royal Family”
  • Think Princess “Lady Di” Diana was a saint
  • Have a huge crush on her son, Prince William
  • You are offended by the fact that I choose to take opioid painkillers  :exclamati for a week each month for to manage my menstrual pain multiplied exponentially compared to what most women experience during their periods because I have a disease called “endometriosis“, and think this qualifies me as a drug addict :rolleyes:, or, the more colloquial term that is thrown my way very, very often because of my choice to use both homeopathic remedies and hydromorphone – “junkie”.  I have tried, literally, everything else that has been suggested to me by friends, doctors, the “Internets”, books, and any other source of information to resolve the pain, from hormone replacement therapy to some free reiki at a folk fest.  Unfortunately, if I do not add the evidently blasphemous “narcotic painkiller”, I have to spend five to eight days out of every twenty-eight curled up in the fetal position, crying more often than not.  I do not think I should have to suffer such miserable paralysis for such a significant block of time out of each moon cycle feeling like someone is tearing my guts out when there is a way to dull the feeling.  However, I do not like being drowsy and foggy in the head either, so I am planning on getting a hysterectomy when I move back to my chosen home (at age 26 or 27).  I guess I’m a pretty big fan of choice. WWJD?!!!!! (what would junkie do – choose to become voluntarily infertile well before her thirties, or keep the prescription for pills supposedly “3 limes stronger than heroin”, whatever that means :confused: , and a “junkie” – an offensive word to begin with in my mind) probably would.  Furthermore, I broke up with a partner that I loved and still love, though always more as a dear friend, because I could not stand to watch him self-destruct with the aid of massive quantities of drugs, including opiates of all sorts.  I just do not enjoy synthetic opiates.  As a teenager, I enjoyed stimulants.  Perhaps I’m, once again, plagued for being honest about this, even though I’m honing in on 30 years-old…

<Alright!  I’ve officially paid for my blasphemous thought re: the Princess!  I am relieved of any cognitive dissonance as I would be if I confessed to a Priest or psychiatrist!  The stark immaturity and nastiness of other women never ceases to amaze me.  What this time?  My dad’s first look at me on day one of my period (groggy yet still in a great deal of pain ad nearly immovable, clumsy as all hell, incredibly light-sensitive) while not on antipsychotics, that shut down my reproductive system by reducing dopamine – and no, your doc/psydoc will not tell you about this consequence – in at least seven years happens to coincide with an e-mail cc’d to him from my last former roommate, a secret neo-con dressed up as a hippie, dreadlocks full of dandruff down to the waist and all, stating that she had a great time throwing out all items I forgot as I packed up two years of life in eight hours after making the split-second decision to stay with my dad in Winnipeg, Manitoba, while applying to law schools to save some dough, claiming that she found “CRACK COCAINE” (capitalization in original) in my old bedroom. :lol:   This utter impossibility, I’m guessing, were mistaken remnants of either some actual rocks – the kind that come from the Earth – that I spilled from a lucky bamboo plant, or bits of drywall that are scattered about this apartment because each time her live-in boyfriend goes on his weekly whisky-binge (alcohol of course not being a drug because of its legality) he punches a few new holes in the drywall of the place, after which she subsequently leaves giant gashes on his face with her nails.  She goes on :lol: to state that she kicked out not only me, but my “issues”!  This hipster really had me fooled.  Her dad grows pot for the government and her boyfriend spends his days bumming around local parks selling pot – other pot, as to make as little profit possible.  She’s an “artist” – I should have been tipped off when she bought a piano, just assuming she would be able to play anything she pleased though she had never tinkled the ivories before in her life.  These are the particular baby demons I spoke of recently.  I guess the saturation of the port-city with crack and heroin makes this a popular one among catty women.  Dad, you can be assured that I am not on crack.  Remember the time I had been “manic” for two weeks and finally decided to overdose on Lithium after the boy I was living with at the time arrived home to show me the gorgeous crackpipe he had bought, this being my last sraw with “eality”?  Yeah.Ironically, she had his e-mail address in the first place due to communication required because of my endometriosis “issue” – ladies – what the eff happened to the sisterhood?!  “CRACK COCAINE”…

Realization: This second woman to show no compassion for my womanly problems shares a great deal with the other.  Both are spoiled only children who had incredibly idyllic childhoods that involved travelling the world.  Both have been lucky enough never to have any real tragedy enter their lives…yet.  Both have wardrobes that fill multiple closts.  Both have claimed at times that I am their “best friends”, but have also made me cry blows by saying some of the nastiest things to me I’ve ever been told.

Note to Self: Red flags when meeting new people – be very weary of women in their early twenties with dreads but suspiciously expensive looking clothing.  Perhaps also ask how many times they’ve been to Coachella and if they fell in love with “OK Computer” when they were sixteen or just started listening to this really crazy but great singer named Thom Yorke.   :think: :think: :think: :think: :think: :think: :think: :think: …oh dear.

The Original Point of this Post?

Today I found out that a “street name” for Dilaudid is “Lady Di”.  The street names for drugs never fail to amuse me.  The ecstasy pills imprinted with jumbo jets that were called “airplanes” before 9/11 and then suddenly rose in price and became “Bin Ladens” post “terrorist attack” still take the cake.

Then I remembered the announcement of this Prince William/Kate Middleton engagement this morning and my giggles felt very guilty.

I feel I had a lot more to say about that, but am now.

I am in the latter half of my twenties and the other little girls are still trying to get me in trouble with daddy by making up stories?

How long until I get accused of stuffing my bra with luncheon meat (no word of a lie) like I was by a “BFF” or whatever the equivalent slang nonsense was in the early ’90s?  Wait, I don’t wear bras any more.  Undershirts all the way, baby.

I would have to be using duct tape.

Man, forget the man-children.  They were just coddled and now they are lazy.  It’s the women-children that are ruthless.

…if the girls can’t be women, how the hell are they going to learn to be men?!?

What is PMS (Pre-menstrual Syndrome)?

Shocking new evidence reveals, despite popular belief, and the following offensive images…

(If I saw a guy wearing this shirt any day of the month, I would kick him in the balls. Hard. And probably more than once. Just to let ya know! ;)

…it does not exist!

It began as a joke, then became quite serious, then was realized to be 99.9999….% accurate, in the 99.9999% of women of child-bearing age who experience menstruation to some degree.  This shocking new finding was discovered by scarsarestories last night, November 12, 2010:

12/11/10!!!!

Indeed, this was no accident.  She was not in the laboratory, nor menstruating, but feeling slightly weepy.  She went outside to smoke a cigarette and looked at the moon.  Yes, her “moon time” was only a day or two away – she was prone to start bleeding anytime within the next 24-48 hours.  “Oh, PMS…” she thought.

Then, the revelation jumped suddenly into her mind.  Whether or not Diana, Sarasvati, or any other bloody wise Goddesses were also in the room cannot be determined.  In fact, as her findings are based on the simplest of logic, and she had just begun to look at materials to study for the LSAT, her astonishing discovery may ironically have been caused in part by a standardized test that looms from patriarchical rule.

Her logic, and now Our logic draw from the following simple deductions:

  • (As stated) 99.999% of the population of women of child-bearing age menstruate.
  • Our linear perception of time and space necessitates that there will be a “period before her period” :lol: – that is to say, there must be a state of “pre”, before there can be a state of “menstrual”.  Every woman that bleeds doesn’t before she does.  Further, the day or two before she bleeds, have been labeled as “pre”-blood (although the entire month could be considered “pre-menstrual”, that opens a whole other can of worms and historical discourse, so let’s not let our minds wander now).
  • A “syndrome” is defined as a negative abnormality of some sort – certainly one that occurs in less than 50% of the general population.  For example, “Down’s Syndrome”.  At my current age, there is about a 0.12% chance that if I were to give birth, the baby would be born with this condition, impairing “normal” development.
  • However, all women that menstruate go through a period (no pun intended, really) of “pre-menstruation”! In preparation to shed her womb, certain hormonal changes take place during this time that may or may not cause varied degrees of increased emotionality and abdominal cramping, among other things.  This is a natural and necessary bodily phenomenon that happens to all of us women – 51% of the world population!
  • Something that happens to all members of a certain population cannot be called a “syndrome”!  A “syndrome” describes “abnormality”!  “Pre-menstruation” is the normalist of all normalities in a normal, normal world!
  • Thus…take off that “S”.  There is no such thing as “PMS”, only “PM”.  There is no such thing as “PMS-ing”!!! It could be argued that the term “PM-ing” could be substituted by the men who use this popular term to describe a woman in a bad mood, a woman who doesn’t agree with a statement he just made, a woman who doesn’t feel like licking his balls, etc.

…Liberate yourselves, ladies, and take that damn “S” off of “PMS”!

And this chick …full of s**t (speaking not only of her t**s)! Women didn’t make it up, men did!!!! (considering the vast number of female physicians practicing in 1923, this can also be taken as Truth, based on simple logic…Cheers!      )

:cystg


New Benefits for the Disabled Under Stephen Harper’s “Canada Action Plan”: Massive Cutbacks Disguised as Bonuses

“Oh, no, you’re much too ‘high functioning’.  So, what else was that you needed from me?”

This was the answer my doctor in Vancouver (General Practitioner/”Mental Health”… Enthusiast/Poor Mathematician – that one) gave me when I asked her about renewing my papers for the Canada Disability Tax Credit/Benefit.  I knew there was more to the story because the phrase “high functioning” was stated.  There’s always more to the story when a doctor utters this excuse for not signing some kind of government or other document.  I did not press her – she has certainly never been unfair about signing off on a well-deserved absence from work or school, whether due to “physical illness”, “mental illness”, or a combination thereof (the latter generally being the rule – often but not always caused by the medication that I take or have taken for “mental illness” :doctor: ).  I was calm, as I also knew the answer awaited me in my hometown, in the office of a psychiatrist with some anarchist tendencies.  (Scroll down to the red points at the end if you aren’t interested in the rest of this article to find out why you are no longer going to receive your tax credit).

You see, when “our” Prime Minister Stephen Harper released a list of new “benefits” under the incredibly original title for the equivalent of a “stimulus package” (Canada Action Plan) – I acted like a good little patriot should and scoured the website version of the documentation for any action that might stimulate me :twisted: .  In other words, I found my convoluted way to the pages that purported to list any new benefits for “individuals” and “students”, as I was both an individual and a student at the time.  The fifty-plus-page document that appeared before me was certainly not as deceptively accessible as the button with the smiling faces of “individuals, including students” that I finally located was, but Firefox could take care of that for me.  I began typing search terms into the “find” box (activated by choosing “find” under the edit menu on the toolbar) that applied to me.  Some words and disappointments in, I typed in “disability”, recalling that I had been receiving this tax-deduction (passed along to my father most years as I did not make enough money to be asked to pay tax by Harper, myself – this is an option with a lot of tax credits up here in the land of igloo-dwellers) from 2005-2009.

Success!  “An extra $453 (dollars) to be designated for each individual receiving the disability tax benefit”.  Four hundred fifty-three dollars sounded, frankly, awesome, to my broke ass – bedridden in the middle of my second disastrous semester at Simon Fraser University, my teaching position having been taken away once my boss discovered I was a mental patient, and not only that, but was involved with other mental patients! – tax return season was fast approaching and I had actually made money the previous year.  I immediately let the fellow who does my taxes know, and he thanked me for the important bulletin.  Thus, I was rather annoyed when a tax specialist or whatever you call a retired fellow who actually seems to enjoy doing others’ taxes for incredibly little payback, left messages asking me to find this clause in the aforementioned document again.  I told a middleman to pass along the message that such things were his job to take care of.  I was very busy trying to finish a 133% courseload in spite of the fact that I could hardly get out of bed (pre-emergency surgery), and already very embittered as no professor in sight had any sympathy for my plight.  Instead, I was made a pariah of, being told, “never in my 26 years of teaching have I seen a student so ill attempt to finish a semester and not go on medical leave!” by my theory professor, who also happened to be my (now former) co-supervisor.  I was befuddled enough by this financial proposal – going on “medical leave” would have meant losing the grant I was surviving off of.  I suppose all students during his prior 26 years of teaching had very large trust funds.  If this is the case, he must be a sheltered man, and Burnaby Mountain an even more sheltered “Hill” than I previously thought.

Surely the tax-man could find the word “disability” by searching the “Action Plan” (I always want to put several exclamation marks after that phrase/slogan/propaganda-nonsense-title, but will refrain).  Not so.  I was not pleased, but sometime between my somewhat infamous presentation for the final theory class and coming out of anaesthesia in the post-op room at Vancouver’s sickeningly disorganized and unsanitary General Hospital (I found sharing a room with a male geriatric patient who coughed his lungs out in between snores all night rather inappropriate, being a young woman gynaecological patient and all…and then there was the staph infection that burst up from a tiny papercut on my thumb when I had visited someone there the previous fall – please forgive any bias :doctor: :doctor: :doctor: ) I forgot about the whole thing.

Skip forward to the present.  November.  April is tax season.  Any documents describing extenuating circumstances that warrant further benefits/tax credits must be handed in within the next few days if you want them to be considered for the 2010-2014 tax period.  Well, not really, but “EXPECT DELAYS” if you do not do so.  I arrived in Winnipeg with high hopes to have my papers signed, but was instead told the sad story behind why tax-man knew nothing of this “$453 bonus”, and Vancouver doc had spat out “high-functioning” before jumping into a new sentence so fast that I couldn’t even smirk.

As not to break broken doctor-patient confidentiality :takuts – well, no names are ever mentioned, so, not really… – I cannot give any specific examples of cases shot down under Harper’s reformulated “tax credit program for the physically or mentally disabled” but I can describe the hoax – it’s an oldie but a goodie!

It was a fluke I ever read that document.  It was only up for a couple of weeks, and Harper knows nothing about us “diligent and ‘disabled’”, so the poor moron didn’t even realize he was providing false hope to a large group.  Here’s how his little “Action Scam” works, anyhow:

  1. Paperwork for doctors re: “disability tax credit” appears to be identical to the documentation available during previous years.
  2. Unfortunately, once submitted, said doctor receives the real thing by mail a couple of weeks later – a set of questions so loaded and specific that approximately 50% of their patients who previously qualified to receive the tax credit no longer will. For example, rather than “does this individual have difficulty managing finances due to their disability?”, the follow-up documentation demands that the physician state a response to a question such as, “can this individual, under no circumstances, manage their own money?”.

Now, if I’ve ever seen “action” to benefit the people of “Canada”, this sounds like a “plan”!  The “people” of course being those in the “business” sector whose pockets are now filling with money formerly forwarded to some of this country’s most hard-working folks – those who choose to work despite the fact that they could survive off the “assistance” mentioned in my last post for their entire lives if they chose to.

So, scoundrel Stephen Harper and his squad of Conservative goons have pulled off a truly classy move – they’ve built up yet another fence covered in “Canada Action Plan” signage (these have gone up about one per every twenty city blocks to give a low estimate – it seems that no infrastructure improvement project doesn’t have a big “Wave and Say ‘Thank-You Mr. Harper!’” sign around its fence-off since the “Plan!!!!!!!!!!!” [couldn't hold back that time, I apologize] was instated).  This particular fence doesn’t appear scheduled to be taken down.


I haven’t seen many disabled people tearing down fences with their bare hands lately.  Have you?



Getting on “Disability Assistance” in Manitoba – Demoralizing, Discriminatory, Disgusting…

I am always searching for another source of “income”, or money… – right now I have a sheet of bus tickets, a sheet of stamps, a bowl with $9 and change in it, a defaulted credit line, and a maxed out MasterCard to my name (well, and an iPhone, but such things generally aren’t counted as assets/liabilities!  I suppose bus tickets and stamps aren’t either, but they were in my immediate line of vision – and I’m crazy, remember? :gila: ).

Obviously Insane

However, this shall improve, as I must not forget an appointment next week to begin again the demoralizing process of getting on “disability social assistance” in my temporary province of residency, Manitoba.  No matter how sick you are, you may not pass go and collect a measly $400 – $600/month, depending on needs – even more bizarre than when I had to go on “assistance” seven years ago, for example, “special note from doctor required if you require an allowance for a telephone connection to get in touch with said doctor” (would this not apply across the board…such questions are futile, i.e. QUESTION ANY STATEMENTS SUCH AS THESE AT YOUR OWN RISK) – without attending the notorious Orientation in Room A, at the “assistance” office on Rorie St., the architecture designed to resemble a traditional First Nations lodge of sorts, a touch that I cannot find words to express my disgust for.

The “orientation” involves being shown charts of how much more you could be making at a minimum wage job, and the horrendous effect you are having on all proper citizens - i.e. workers and taxpayers. Expect the latter word to be mentioned at least 100 times during the grueling forty-five minute “orientation” (orientation to what?  Feeling like crap about oneself? What if that’s already the reason you’re sitting in this room, room A:capedes ).  In sum, the requirement to attend this meeting if you’re seeking a little government handout due to unexpected physical or mental illness – which I’m sure you’ve already paid for in spades via “Employment Insurance” contributions if you’ve ever held a job, however since “Employment Insurance” is so tightly wrapped in red tape and is nearly impossible to obtain – is absolutely unavoidable.

In my case specifically, since Simon Fraser University considers all teaching and research positions held by lowly students as “financial aid”, this institution insures that none of its student-employees are eligible for “E.I.” in case of illness, injury on the job, family emergencies, etc.  You’re on your own, kids!!!

Obviously, that’s far beside the point :) .  Back when I was nineteen, both much quieter and louder than I am now, only in different ways – I suppose I’ve learned a few things – I dared raise my hand during the “orientation”.  I asked if my presence was required, as I was currently not able to work, and thus minimum wage jobs were not of any relevance to me.  Nurse Ratchet, who just happened to be giving this little seminar of sorts, came very close and started menacing me. I feared that the throwing of chalk or an icepick lobotomy was inevitable, perhaps both, and if so, in what order?  Luckily, there was only shouting:

“If you don’t want to be here, get out now!  Make another interruption and I’ll kick you out myself!… and you will get nothing!!!

At no point during the “orientation” are you told anything about how you will collect your funds, what information you are going to have to provide once the cell door is released and you are herded back out into the main room, in all its pine-carved glory, where you wait for an “Intake Appointment”.  Before I went through this whole experience the first time, I thought that appointments were generally scheduled around a certain point in time.  I was shockingly wrong.  There is no seeming order to when one’s appointment will be – indeed, if the term “Kafkaesque” ever deserved usage, it would be here.  You sit on an uncomfortable bench in this general area, not only built such that discrimination is implied by one’s presence, but such that the volume of individuals speaking in the room is combined to a level that would give an amoeba a migraine.

Indeed, you sit.  If you manage to approach an employee to inquire about your expected waiting time, you will be quoted a line directly out of The Trial – for example, “it will be soon”, “it is not time yet”, or “you cannot ask a question like that here :evil: ”.  So, don’t bother.  Bring ibuprofen or your headache kill-pill of choice (booze also seems to be common, and I understand why) and get ready for a sore back, a sore butt, and prepare yourself for the fact that you may sit all day without being called for an “appointment”.  No, you may be commanded to return at 9:00 am the following morning to wait some more.  I have not heard of anyone being called back for a third day of the addition of injury (back and butt) to injury (cause for needing a handout from the taxpayers) but don’t quote me on this – as I said, it has been a while.

So, sit down, shut up, and be made to feel like a criminal for being ill.

See you next Wednesday in Room A!

Bonus Tip: It is nearly impossible to get through to the office at (204) 948-4000, such that your name may be recorded for the “orientation”.  The hopeful message that your application will be considered without having to attend the “orientation”, as the line asks you to “press one” to be connected directly to an assistance office in your area if you have been on disability in Manitoba previously, is sadly only that – hopeful.  To qualify under this clause and be stepped up in line you must have been on disability in Manitoba within the past 45 days. So, you “press two”.  A busy signal – and a voice telling you to hang up, rendering it impossible to auto-redial this awesome bureaucracy.  I recommend calling five minutes before closing (this is how I got through) or immediately when the line opens in the morning to avoid the exasperation of being told to hang the eff up, over and above the rest of this mess.

Tomorrow’s Topic: Harper’s Lies to the Disabled – Massive Cutbacks Beneath Shiny Exterior of “Action Plan” Promises (or what my shrink in Winnipeg is willing to tell me because he’s just as much of an anarchist as I am :Yb )

I want to make a mistake, I want to do it on purpose, I want to waste my time.

-F.A. -(from Apocalypse Effexor: Redux Diary page…therefore unedited! :malu: )…not usually.  But Effexor-wise, this is kind of how I feel about my week without Effexor, and its end in a plant-derived, dopamine raising substance that wasn’t paid for by the government, as the Effexor tablets, that would cost about $400 a month are.  I made a “mistake”, more an accident, by destroying my supply of Effexor for the week.  Then I tried something I basically knew would be impossible – of course with some hope in mind that this would magically be the end of popping three very large red gelcaps every morning to keep my head together, just as I have that spark of hope each time I walk into the office of a new psychopharmacologist (let’s call them what they are) that usually leads me on for a few hour-long appointment, about helping me get off this drug, but soon grows annoyed at talking about life and tries to convince me that I can achieve this goal by taking a new handful of gelcaps or packed pills or the ones you can peel a layer off of…just like Anne says – blue, yellow, green; “I’ve become quite the addict” – to to learn how much of an addict they made me, to learn how deep Effexor is in control of my brain.  I sure got my answer.  I was expecting it would be sickening, and expected the second after second after half-second brainzaps and light-sensitivity and walking into doorways I got this morning, when I finally got off the couch, the brown couch :) , wanting desperately to get something done – Indian Summer, the smell of sweet decay in the air and smoke lingering from bonfires from the night before, all the while feeling heat on your October-skin.  Zap zap zapzapzap zap zapzap zap, as I sat on the toilet, light on like nails on a chalkboard in my brain.  MUST.  DO.  SOMETHING. I cannot lie on that couch, nor can I vacuum and hide pills for some night-terror induced reason involving relatives I haven’t seen since I was a small child (indeed, red alert, in the Ashcroft-model sense), for a sixth day.  Well, the first two were not so bad, although I do have a very difficult time remembering them, interacting with people?  It doesn’t seem reasonable after the past days of constant nausea and terror/sleep.  The horror of Apocalypse Effexor is making it difficult to enjoy any kind of “relief”, whether it be from zaps (other symptoms still present – read the pamphlet, I’m in Effexorlessness) or lack of energy.  Well, that’s not really true – I remembered and discovered some really interesting things about brains on music and my own – playing all evening would have been wonderful but I have to keep in mind the possibility that figuring out how to access that skill I was starting to master might not always be pretty and enjoyed by my roommates, who have put up with my couch-ridden delirium for the past three days.  I didn’t want to have to inflict myself upon others 24/7 again in my short life, but that was, financially-speaking, a complete pipe-dream, at age almost-26, living in Vancouver, where rent in the “ghetto” is now almost as high as rent in the West End.  The odd much bigger pipe loft thrown in there, millions upon millions, the rest of us.  Who do not perform “perfectly”, who show emotion, who have vices, who feel really damn lazy sometimes, who feel the pleasure and the deep pain of being strapped to this body.  So, an experiment, and the results yielded were interesting.  They bring tears of terror to think about, but they were very interesting and revealing of what I am facing here.  There has to be a doctor out there willing to help people get off this poison without the pain that we, uneducated consumers socializaed from birth, very literally – is it not a doctor we look in the eyes before those of our mothers’, no? – to take his (for those of us that were searching for “father figures”, men and women/and her orders and prescriptions strictly – finish all of these antibiotics, take two pills every six hours, one in the morning and one and a half at night.  Are these to be our fathers?  Washed down at the demanded time.  Mornings are long.  Hours are longer.  Tears without water, cutting scenes out of paper for dear life, running around the building and collecting power cords from the old apartment now – I am thankful to be freed of our – it was mine the whole time, my little mess, intentions good, nature uncontrollable, the pain of now not being sure if he thought I was malingering around his only intellectual equal on the planet!’s survey contemporary theory class.  No, life has been painful, I would not seek (the tears have turned towards a belly full of silent laughter) to pretend to make it more so, so much that doctors had to dig through my guts.  Heads need shaking.  Some stream of consiousness, good girl, mention Ophelia, gossamer in water, I picture green with pink embroidery, personally.  Mistakes paid forward.  All meant in ‘good faith’.  This is my body and my mind and I shall do with it what I wish and I’m sorry if you have a problem with that but your status does not trump my right to stop taking my Flinstone’s Vitamins for a short while to see if I can live without hoping I’ll get a red one.  Red mistake.  I will dust myself off good and proper on Monday, I will be over homesickness for a place I hoped would exist before I got here but never did, after an hour or so the tears will never be wet and I can not sleep through an appointment – why is there always an appointment – some obligatory time sacfricied for “the man” – more tears turn to belly laughs, no sounds of sobbing from my eyes or my guts – literally – reading over your credit card bill twice and figuring a way to pay it and the psychological aftermath of economic instability – the fallout.  I don’t think I’ll open my Simon Fraser University inbox ever again, and I should have done so a month ago.  I do not care.  I do not care if a professor is going to take the words of a white, blue-eyed, Texan businessman who employs underage women and exploits the sacred tradition of Shamanism and sells it as drug-induced psychotherapy to wealthy westerners, charging them a fortune that seems like a good deal to North Americans and Australians, white haired, blue-eyed, to look into the beautiful dark eyes filled with anxiety at fetching you the right drink even though she has no clue what you are saying, whose pubescent buttocks are seen for a few seconds as she hurriedly goes inside to the bar to decipher these foreign requests for ice and liquor and coca leaves – something with coca leaves because they’re not legal in the ex-pat’s home and native land – over the word of a young, feminist scholar who is known for radically exposing the truth, no matter how sick it is, and in addition, never done a qualitative project where such raw research, if it must be ethnographic, gets the “publishable” stamp without a chart of outdated subculture theory and consists mainly on argot and hierarchies – so it’s okay to talk about “tramp stamps” in L.A. – if one of the participants in that project contacted the professor of the same class she was subject to participating in a qualitative study – M.A., maybe Ph.D., lumped together, same thing, different stage of cash grab – a young woman and gang member who called out the researcher for calling her a “hood rat” because her stamp was not on her lower back but across her neck – falsified data, the need for another member of this category later to be charted, made public, created…social change?? :confused:  – In this scenario, which could have happened – who would be believed?  The woman with “publishable” data that is already out there but used different terminology, and comes to class, every class, on time and wearing much perfectly applied make-up – no dark circles – asks questions that threw us off, and my temperature rose as I left the “hot seat” and realized she had mixed me up with big words but I had a perfect defense…but I was not fast enough and she looked so utterly “professional” in a suit at times, something I will never adorn…, or the straggler who unearthed an illegal business that is likely common to certain cities/towns in the Amazon where “culture” can be experienced by the slightly off the traveled off-road, maybe adorning dreads or a dirty pair of runners and muddy socks – corruption of the highest degree in the name of tourism – government grants, I bet, for Americans to bring a taste of cannibalism to a new place, wow, true Freudian slip, I meant to write capitalism and am actually quite shaken.  Whoa.  Tourism in Peru, G.D.P, money, hands.  Academic dishonesty!  Holy crap what has it come to…

SSHRC out of undergrad drop-out.  Statistical anomaly as usual.  Graduate student taking electives and classes in different departments and making the bureaucracy difficult to navigate – I guess this was easier for students when you were in my shoes?  Do you not know that you have to do your job without picking a young woman to act as a scapegoat, drawing attention away from the internal discord, the external review, students like me who paid attention and agreed and spoke out about it.  Made it loudly known that even when quiet, our peer-group is completely in agreement and feels like they were ripped off.  Well, if it weren’t for one’s fabulous scholar of a supervisor, providing that they do not retire and move four hours away from campus halfway through your degree, which you have been progressing on more than most students, collecting material for over a year while they have yet to start – not because you want a good grade or a publication but because you care and want to help people, want to practice sociology in its context of revealing social insanity and exposing it – and in addition, choosing to attend Simon Fraser because this would-have-been supervisor, who will always remain a soft of mystery, her softspoken voice supposedly that of a former “hell-cat”, though I noticed no difference between her expression when I arrived, all decorated in gold and promise, bells coming later to make noise, and her expression when I left in tears that were obviously attached to suppressed sobs, after reading the e-mail where I explained the incredibly difficult reasons why Simon Fraser University had violated my rights as a student five times over, added stress to my life that had a great impact on my health, and I had to leave this place she had promised me to be right, just for me!, it is pretty in the summer, because I would be ashamed to give them any more money in tuition and fees, never mind hold a degree from the place, not caring whether or not it would be “tarnished” by the good ol’ boys team – stir up some media attention on their sparkling “ethics” abilities to spot a young woman criminally revealing possibly “made-up” information about the exploitation of Peruvian women for an expendable methods class – what, the fourth advanced methods class I’ve taken?  I think I understand now, sir!

Vancouver Detox Cordova House’s Guinea Pig Experiment: Drug/Alcohol Withdrawal via SEROQUEL?

I will be writing a full letter of complaint to the Vancouver‘s “detox centre” on Main at Cordova, Harbourlight Cordova House, across the street from the cop shop on the DTES, very soon.  For now, I wanted to let you know about thie horrifying phenomenon that this is taking place at this self-purported medical detox centre, under the supervision of a young psychiatrist.  He seems to be carrying out a guinea pig experiment on human beings, without their permission, and at the same time, making dishonesty mandatory if one is to avoid being a rat in a cage.

“You must go through extreme pain to get over your addiction,” this doctor claims.

This statement alone makes no sense, as negative punishment is the least effective strategy when attempting to change someone’s behaviour.

Now here’s the part that makes no sense whatsoever, and the reason why all three people I’ve known who have stayed at Cordova House (one for alcohol, two for heroin – myself not included, think what you like, although I have been drugged with Seroquel at mental hospitals – an extremely unpleasant, “zombifying”, mind-blankening experience for lack of better terms) have escaped and resumed using their substance of choice, and one was successful at a different medical detox centre where proper methods, explained below these definitions, were used. Unfortunately, last I heard, the others continue to use their substance of choice, or have added others to a new cocktail.

Drugs: (including alcohol even though it is “legal”…it does kill brain cells while marijuana does not…look it up if you don’t believe me) get you high by increasing dopamine (feel-good stimulating) levels in the brain.  Dopamine is a neurotransmitter – one that many “antidepressants” try to heighten.  This simple diagram demonstrates how dopamine is “thought to work” in the brain.  Dopamine (represented by cats) is passed to the next neuron (represented by the pacman) via neurotransmission.  I don’t mean to be a condescending idiot, I just grew up in the 80s and really love pacman.  Drugs that produce a “high”, as well as many antidepressants, work by causing more dopamine to be fed to the pacmen, or to hang around in the space between the pacmen and cats for a longer period.

Addiction: Is characterized by 1) tolerance (one needs more to experience the same effect), and 2) physical additction (much different than “psychological addiction” – but rather a serious illness [PHYSICAL DEPENDENCE, not addiction itself - I reject the "disease model" of addiction, as long-time blog readers probably know!] that could even result in death if not properly treated [ex/ a daily high-dose heroin user may have a seizure if s/he stops using altogether, at once - what has been called the "cold turkey" method]

Seroquel: An atypical antipsychotic that immediately reduces dopamine levels in the brain when ingested. As stated elsewhere on this blog, atypical antipsychotics were first used (or rather “tested) on communist dissidents under the Stalinist regime of the USSR, to “suppress critical and lofty thought(s)”. Below is a diagram showing how dopamine is blocked or inhibited:


Now medical detox centres are not exactly the Ritz either, although some conservative politicians may disagree (have they ever stayed there, after a serious heroin addiction for say, 3 years?), but one receives legitimate medical treatment. Rather than being put on “maintenance methadone treatment”, simply substituting a heroin addictionfor a methadone addiction, patients are quickly weaned off opiates by drinking a 5 mL less of a dose of methadone per day, to dim constant nausea, insomnia, muscle pain, shaking, sweats, etc.  Such a fast withdrawal does not eliminate these symptoms, but makes them more bearable.  Just as I believe I do not deserve to suffer when I am in severe pain due to my chronic reproductive illness, endometriosis, I, do not believe those dependent on drugs, like the friends I have mentioned, deserve to suffer more than necessary; in their shoes I would also choose the option of medical detox via methadone, about a 10 day process.

At “Harbourlight”, the methadone method is only used if users claim they have been shooting grams of heroin each day – as they learn the first stay around, that this is the only way to avoid being forced to take Seroquel, and denied any methadone.  If there is one person you should not be lying to when detoxing, I would think it would be one’s doctor.

Why on earth is Seroquel being used?!?  To torture “addicts” by suddenly shocking their systems, which are used to increased dopamine rather than decreased dopamine?  I simply do not understand.  If a doctor out there reads this and would like to attempt to give me an explanation of how this is in any way therapeutic, I would love to hear it.  In the meantime, a formal letter of complaint on how this method is destroying the lives of many, including two friends, is in the works.  As are my attempts to capture the attention of local media.

Where is a woman’s clitoris located?

<”Dr.” Phil says, “you may want to have small children leave the room now.” :hammer: >

Actually, you may not. The fact that, in my experience, men over forty still have trouble finding a woman’s clitoris, and the fact that one less recent ex of mine wrote a short story about an advventure we went on and described the “incredibly difficult task of getting a woman off” and his very noteworthy accomplishment (by hand, on a Greyhound bus, and no, I got myself off by grinding the seat!), scares me.  He never brought me to orgasm once, but one of his favourite claims regarding our sex life was that, “God, himself was masturbating when we had sex”.  Is there that little emphasis on a woman’s experience of pleasure during sex in our culture that young through middle-aged men haven’t, and thus, may likely die not ever having, found a clitoris on a living woman?  I don’t know about you, but I find this scary.  So is having something in that general area rubbed so hard it feels like your partner is trying to push it back into your body – especailly, when magically, the very sensitive target has been hit by fluke.

Now, I have no “mainstream” political/feminist values about pornography.  Actually, as soon as I discovered it as a young teenager, I started watching.  However I absolutely detest porn when it is obvious that the pleasure is one-sided (i.e. only the man in the video is experiencing pleasure).  I really don’t understand how fast and hard anal sex, as pictured in porn films, could ever be pleasurable for a woman.  It’s very easy for me to tell if a woman is enjoying herself, and the same is true of some men, but a rare few.  I am a picky porn-watcher, usually watching lesbian stuff because watching the “parts” I have being satisfied is much more enjoyable to me than watching a penis being pleasured, since I have no idea what it feels like and imagine it is somewhat different.  I really despise watching a woman give a man a blowjob.  They call it a “job” for good reason.

In a sociology of sexuality class one day (an exceptionally poor class comprised solely of activities like the one I will describe…;), the “professor” (I have no idea how she obtained this title) had us sit in groups of four and name as many terms we could for male so masturbation.  As it took us far less than the given twenty minutes to come up with a list – goddess knows what the instructor had left to do, not being a smoker – and all group member stared at one another awkwardly, I tried to strike up some conversation on topic =.  I asked the two men in the group if they thought that most men learned how to have sex through watching pornography.  They were eager and adamant about saying, “yes!!”  Yikes.  And end of conversation – I suppose I should have asked a more “open-ended question”!  Not much clitoral stimulus going on in mainstream porn, as opposed to the stuff I watch.  This is definitely part of the problem.  When the professor came back, each group was to write the names they had come up with on the board.  Duplicates were erased, and we were to write them down.

“Okay, good work guys!  See you next class.”

What the eff?  It actually would have been somewhat interesting to examine the names – the violence behind terms like “whacking off” and “choking the chicken”, the mundane and very unsexy nature of “jacking off” or “rubing one out”, and the hilarity of “spanking the monkey” or “stroking the weasel”.  Never mind the lack of terminology for female masturbation, consisting primarily of clitoral stimulation.  Perhaps there was a connection of some sort…  I was the only person who offered a colloquialism for the practice – “jilling off”.  The prof laughed, along with a couple of other women in the class.  A depressingly small number of women in the class.

Women that don’t even know the location?  Okay, come on now.  Why do North Americans have such a problem with “getting to know” their own bodies, and worshiping them, enjoying all the pleasure they can provide?  Mommy and daddy aren’t going to scold you for touching yourself anymore, and probably are nowhere nearby.

I must now give a huge shout out to my private girl’s school in Winnipeg, where in grade nine or ten – nine, I think – we were hoarded into the gym and given the best “sex-ed” type presentation ever.  There was a board with about 50 different colours and sizes of condoms, a lot of dildos of a lot of sizes, and even a “Venus Butterfly”!  It prompted a girl in the back to whisper a question about its use, and the absolutely sexy and confident woman presenting (yes, a little jealous and a little crush and a little “I want to be her”, so, now, a little smile – a big one, actually.  Yes.) to ask, “you girls do know where your clits are, right?”  The silence was absolute, until I let out a snicker.  The broken silence I guess caused one of the “popular with boyfriend-status girls” to ask, “how will we know when we’ve found it?”, which was answered with, “Oh, you will know it!” Brilliant.

Now, the clitoris is not that damn hard to find – nothing like the elusive G-Spot.  Perhaps the best way to describe it to men is to relate it to their bodies.  “It’s like a tiny little penis with foreskin, close to the urethra, really, nothing more than a mini-version of your “hot beef” (and yes, it’s “injection”, absolutely hilarious and sexier than anything I’ve ever heard in the English language, no doubt!  Please, take me now!  :norose: )

In the back of the auditorium, as the lovely “psychologist” gave this lecture on safe sex and female masturbation, the majority of the teachers (almost all women) seated behind us looked rather uncomfortable., like they had just swallowed something disgusting and were trying desperately not to puke before they made it to the washroom.  Her presentation was truly awesome though – I’ll always wonder how many of my peers went home to “find it” that night (I think that night I got off as a wondered, that night…;).  Then I wonder how many of them told their boyfriends, instructed them on how to do it just right, etc.  I’m guessing not as many.  It is our fault too, in part – by “faking it”, men will never learn how to pleasure a woman properly.  However, women who “know how they like it” are branded as sluts – we’re not supposed to know these secrets, as how on Earth could we unless we had been with a bunch of other men who demonstrated the mysteries of the female body!?!? :fuck3:

My main question though, is why wasn’t the same presentation given at the local boys’ schools equivalent to my girls’ school?  Why were boys and girls split up into two different groups when given “sex talks” at certain grades?  Wouldn’t it have been a lot better if we had learned together?

Or, at our non-co-ed schools, boys could maybe be taught where the clitoris is located?  Would that be insane?  Lead to unprotected sex among minors?  Well, no one would want to start a “new” trend!

And so, I have had a rather disappointing sex life so far as I reach 26.  Out of about ten men (a high estimate re: men) I’ve been with – not doing the one-night stand thing much – only one has successfully brought me to climax.  This said, I am an incredibly sexual person – I had my first orgasm at 11 and probably “rubbed one out” almost as often as my teenage boy counterparts for a good chunk of my adolescence.  But hell, I have faked it – I’m incredibly adept at doing so – I can even make myself get a lot wetter, make my vagina contract, etc.  C’mon guys, do you think it’s difficult to make those sounds?  The main reason I’ve put on this act, is because a lot of these men “don’t want to come before you”, but they’re so clueless that this proposition is scary.  It is scary because a lot of the positions that men beg for, ones that they usually admit to have “come up with” by watching porn – and from experience they are seemingly a man’s best friend, second only to anal sex – but they hurt. Most other thousands of creative possibilities do not, so why should we have act out the role of Jenna Jameson – isn’t it enough just to pleasure one another, to be us?  And you might be very proud of your large penis – cool, it’s very pretty, but I don’t know why you’re showing off to me – it a sex marathon is decidedly going to be for dessert, it gets really sore to “make love”/”have sex”/”fuck” more than once per night a lot of the time, and depending on length per session, twice, in one night.  I suppose that’s the price you (should) pay for being with the studliest stud in the men’s locker room?  Damn, suddenly it sounds like we’re back in high school, but, no, guys, you can’t have your cake and eat it too!  Your massive member means less sex.  (I know, that idiom makes no sense, but it fits!)

If a woman is to be pleasured, the majority cannot reach orgasm, or even come close, with mere penetration.  Thus you’ve just gotta know where her clit is.  I wish mom’s would teacher their boys, but I suppose this would be a little weird, so look at some pictures of female anatomy!  Like these:

1 Clitoris
2 Clitoral Hood (prepuce)
3 Labia Majora (outer lips)
4 Labia Minora (inner lips)
5 Urethral opening
6 Vaginal opening
7 Hymen

or the other million available on the web, like this 3-D one! Then, ask questions – “does this feel good, baby?”  And don’t be afraid to hear, “no.”  It’s not an insult, it’s just going to make you a much better lover in turn.  Now, women – it is our responsibility to tell a man when he is not doing it right and you are either extremely bored and awaiting this interruption to your day to be over, or are in pain.  Men are not psychic like we are. :nohope: . But we are alike in the fact that we should both be having an equal amount of fun in the bedroom, and pleasure should be completely reciprocal.  If it is not, what is the point?  Yes, it might be frightening to tell a guy he’s not making you feel a thing, but if his reaction is frightening, then you’ve saved yourself a few dates with an asshole, haven’t you?

I think you will find that talking about these things is not at all embarassing as you may expect, but a pretty great turn-on.  If there’s one thing better than sex (in the whole bodily realm of being), it is talking about sex.

That’s true for me, anyhow, so don’t feel too crazy if you don’t share this opinion!  :siul:

I was getting there with the last one…the next one is going to have some work out for him if he, too, is in his thirties, and still doesn’t now how to make me ***! :gila:

Toviaz – controls bladder, causes constipation!

Hello readers!

I am very busy dealing with the previously mentioned “criminal justice” situation right now. :(

However, as laughter is survival, I thought I would share this hilarious commericial with you!  I could only find it in a “block of ads”, so the ad I’m speaking about begins at approx. the 1:32 mark in the video below.

Control your “overactive bladder”, but lose control over your bowels.  Way to go, big pharma!  What a miracle cure!

Vaccination Debate: An example of intelligent conversation, finally!

“Formerly, when religion was strong and science weak, men mistook magic for medicine; now, when science is strong and religion weak, men mistake medicine for magic.”
Thomas Szasz

Finally, I have initiated some well-researched, intelligent debate on the hot topic of vaccination – i.e. folks who don’t hold “medical expertise” to their hearts so dear that any critical comment causes them to lash out unreasonably, have started discussing this here. :)   I know it is on the topic of the “sociology of medicine” much more so than the “sociology of psychiatry”, but it is a beautiful demonstration of the conversation that can be generated when a community of critical thinkers is formed on the Internet – different perspectives can be discussed openly, without anyone shouting words that hint at frightening dogmatism that deny the central premises of “science”.  Here is part of that conversation – a huge thank-you to all who participated!

Comment 1: I would be interested to hear your take on the epidemic in California surrounding Pertussis or Whooping Cough. Many doctors and nurses that I’ve talked to, informally, seem to blame it on parents not getting vaccinations. An ER nurse told me that she in the past would see 1-2 cases a month. She saw 16 this week. What are your thoughts? Thanks!

Scars’ Reply:

Wow! I hadn’t heard about this. Pertussis is one of the vaccines I believe children should get – the vaccine has been around for well over 30 years, does not contain the additives that “new” vaccines do, and has shown itself not to manifest in any longitudinal medical problems among the general population. However, I am also interested in the fact that since these vaccines have been around for so long, children aren’t building up natural immunities, and just like the overuse of antibiotics caused “superbugs”, over-vaccination may cause “super-viruses”, so to speak.

Has this taken place in a particular community in California, where us west coasters :wink: would be prone not to vaccinating their children? Some kind of survey would have to be conducted to find out if not vaccinating children could be the root cause, and even then a direct correlation would not be able to be made – I suppose if doctors and nurses are saying that they’ve struggled with parents over this issue, it is fairly common, but still – by nature of their jobs they come from a slightly biased stance (ex/ the socialization that they undergo during med school, which promotes all things pharma, especially NEW things pharma, and belittles other approaches to an amazing degree – I’ve heard this from several med students, and seen it reflected in the behaviour of younger doctors).

Here in Vancouver, there have been several recent cases of measles, actually. The unfortunate thing about how dogmatic people on both the “pro” and “anti” vaccination sides of the debate are, is that it doesn’t lend the situation to being properly researched – the information available, in the format of reasonable points from each side – aside from that Frontline documentary – resembles the nonsense of an episode of Bill O’Reilly! However, through conversations like these we can explore this issue deeper, and with open minds. :)

I am trying to get a copy of my own immunization record (I was born in the early 80s) to compare it to the charts/pamphlets of “recommended” vaccines for all children today. What worries me most are influenza vaccines – it is recommended that children get their first at 2 months now. This does not make sense to me. I had a few incredibly horrible flues as a child, but got through them, and had developed immunities against them by the time I was a teenager (i.e. I haven’t had a flu with a fever and puking since then). I will write a post as soon as I obtain this info – as I do believe that measles/mumps/rubella/pertussis/tetanus and a few other shots should be given to kids, for common sense reasons. The number of “boosters” required seems to have increased quite suspiciously though…

Let’s keep this conversation going – exactly what I was hoping to get out of this post.
Cheers!
scars

Comment 2:

As far as I know there has yet to be a study as to why this is happening. All the doctors and nurses made that clear but seemed convinced it was because parents weren’t vaccinating.

Thanks for writing about your opinion of which vaccines are safe. We are getting our daughter fully vaccinated, but she recently contracted pertussis. I guess I worry that parents are simply hearing “vaccinations are bad so I won’t get any” without doing any research of their own. Does that make sense?

I haven’t seen specific communities but the nurse I talked with is located in Orange County.

Comment 3:

I always find it interesting that so called “evidence-based medicine” believers jump immediately to conclusions based on no evidence at all, simply to confirm their own belief systems (and, being just as human as everyone else, what else could one expect?).

If one is going to say not getting vaccinated has caused some epidemic, then one might as well say not having a dog causes pet over-population. It doesn’t follow — no matter how “scientific” the language used, or how forceful the “logic”.

It’s precisely because no one is allowed to really delve into questions about how well medical products REALLY work (without being burned as a heretic, or cast as standing in the shadows of some form of insanity), that these things become unsafe. Then, when they become more and more unsafe, and people start to avoid them as worse than the thing they are supposed to “cure” or “protect” against, then more “witch-burning” starts (and how quickly are witch-burners and the like to accuse others of baby-killing and the like?)

Has anyone checked out the living and other health conditions these children are living in (including what kinds of toxic medical products they’ve been introduced to)?

Has anyone considered that diseases — like every other population of anything on the planet — do and will simply ebb and flow, depending on circumstances we sometimes have no control over?

Has anyone really looked at whether the whooping vaccine actually works, and is not simply presumed to work because of something else ignored?

There’s a lot more going on here than simply not getting a jab of medical product.

Scars’ Reply:

You’re absolutely correct and make a very important point. As a medical researcher – albeit a qualitative, not a quantitative one (as if the latter is any less valid than the former :razz: ) – I cringe every time a ridiculously spurious correlation is made, yet again! :lol: Damn, one of the first things I remember learning in first year university was that “CORRELATION DOES NOT EQUAL CAUSATION”. It is like saying that a “large crane population” in a particular area, and a “sudden surge of pregnant women” is connected.

I can’t say enough about toxic products myself – you might be interested in reading “Flora”’s message on the commentroll from last weekend and my response. She doesn’t use ultra-lysol-magic-erasers and the like (now, with Febreze!) and most of her son’s friends – who seem unusually “clean” – have huge problems with allergies, and a lack of natural immunity to a whole lot of what goes around.

Again like you say, though, burn the witches! In my undergrad thesis – in the academic work section if you ever feel like a long, somewhat dry read hehe – I compare the labeling of women with disorders like “Borderline Personality Disorder” to the witch trials. I.e. You do not fit into the mainstream, your behaviour is for some reason against the grain, thus, you shall be punished, via psychiatrization, or in this case, certain parents being blamed for an “epidemic”.

…and how exactly are we defining “epidemic” now? Are a few, or even several, cases of a disease that hasn’t been seen in the general populace for some time now considered to be an “epidemic”? If that is so, the definition of “epidemic” has changed since I learned about epidemics – ya know, like the black plague and the flu of 1917 and what not…outbreaks that killed millions of people…

Keep up the conversation, all – I’ve been waiting to hear some real debate about this for a long, long time!

Cheers!
scars

Scars’ Reply:

Yes, that makes perfect sense – parents saying, “vaccinations are bad” just because they heard it on TV or from a friend, are not doing their “argument”, or society any favour, nor are they presenting a valid challenge to the hegemonic industry of medicine. Hearsay is to research as cats are to airplanes. :???:

My absolute firmest advice on this topic is do your own research! If one is truly concerned about their child’s safety, one can take the time to do some real research on vaccines – not so hard with the Internet! One can check out various medical journals online, weary of propagandistic material coming from either side of the debate. One can get the opinion of a few different doctors – my GP here in Vancouver is very against over-vaccination and the overuse of antibiotics, and has great evidence to back up her perspectives. However, like me, she does think some vaccines are good and necessary. She discouraged me from getting Hepatitis vaccines before traveling to South America, due to the fact that I reacted badly to one in the past, and that she didn’t think it was necessary, based on “risk” of contracting Hepatitis south of the equator. My former doctor at my university campus came from a different perspective – she was a strong advocate for the H1N1 vaccine. She drove me home once and I asked her to explain her opinion, and it just didn’t make sense to me, but these are very personal decisions.

Actually, I would really like to hear my current GP’s perspective on the pertussis situation in Orange County – I will ask her about it next time I see her! Won’t be until July, but I will definitely discuss it with her!

Best Wishes,
scars

Comment 5:

Two other things never (allowed to be truly) considered by the mainstream medical model:

First, not everyone is going to react the same to everything. Some people are going to be more sensitive to some things, and some people not. That’s not hocus pocus – it’s evolutionary understanding. Modern science recognizes it in germs – 1st semester microbiology makes sure we understand that when confronted with a new toxin, some germs die and others live. But when it comes to people, the modern medical model doesn’t want to hear it. And that’s another reason it’s become so dangerous and causes so much damage. Just because one person is susceptible to whooping cough doesn’t mean everyone will be, and just because one person doesn’t have (or visibly SHOW) bad reactions to vaccine medical products doesn’t mean everyone is safe with them.

Second, research time and time again shows that children/teens and the elderly are absolutely more sensitive to all sorts of things – including toxins as are put into modern vaccines, and including drugs (including psych drugs). Yet what little research is done is usually done on healthy adults, while most medical toxins in vaccines and drugs are given to children/teens and old people.

More reasons modern M.D. medicine (and all the “alternative” medicines that so quickly seek to become “healthier” versions of M.D. medicine) have become so unsafe. Does M.D. medicine HAVE to be unsafe? Absolutely not. But today, where money and power and control are more important to providers and manufacturers than (truly) healthy patients, that’s what we’ve gotten.

Have any of you read “Death by Medicine”. It can be found all over the web – here’s the first PDF version Google found: http://www.webdc.com/pdfs/deathbymedicine.pdf

If you haven’t read it, you should!

Scars’ Reply:

Again, PRECISELY. Would you mind if I post this comment on the main page? Or would you like to post it yourself as a “guest post”?

A HUGE problem in the fields of both medicine and psychology/psychiatry, is that they have absolutely no knowledge of the history of their disciplines. All that is taught is the last 5 – 10 (if one is lucky!) years of “progress”. Thus, those lessons taught in undergrad biology classes are fast forgotten. My own undergrad bio classes were held in a special department called “biology and human concerns” – so I suppose I’m especially sensitive when people start ranting at me about the usefulness of “SHELL VIRUSES!” in vaccines. Yeah, uh-huh, I’m well aware of how vaccines function. But I’m also aware of vaccines are manufactured, and how they are tested!

I am reminded of my critical studies on the use of the fMRI to diagnose “mental illness” – my research deals particular with infants/children, but there is a wonderful book called Picturing Personhood that describes how clinical trials are conducted, re: fMRI, but others as well – solely on ADULT, WHITE MALES. How any researcher of “sound mind”, or possessing any sense of ethics whatsoever, can call this a representative, generalizable, valid study is beyond me, and incredibly frightening.

I have not read that book, but I wouldn’t be surprised if my partner has a copy on the shelf. :wink: Otherwise, I’ll check it out online right away, and likely post it on the blog. :) I also highly recommend Selling Sickness. In fact, I think I will add it to the “recommended readings” list right now.

Cheers!

Comment 6:

First, feel free to post as you with. I’m not copyrighted ;)

Second, the “Death by Medicine” is actually just a short data study – not a book. Several NDs and (I think?) 1 MD took a real look at AMA data and discovered that doctors/MD medicine actually causes more harm today than heart disease and cancer. Fascinating.

Scars’ Reply:

I’ve heard this, too! Medical negligence causes far more deaths. Recently, when I had surgery on my left ovary, it made me feel really “safe” when the nurse made a huge sharpie-marker cross on my left abdomen, indicating “this one!” Not to mention infections in hospitals – when my partner, Alarryk was in the hospital here for two weeks in November, he caught a “super” staph infection that has left huge scars all over his left leg, which he could hardly move for some time.

I’m getting excited about the news out of Toronto about the G-20 protests right now, but I shall be posting our discussion shortly. :)

*HUGE SIGH OF RELIEF*

So, there are many reasonable folks out there willing to discuss this topic without sending personal insults my way.

Now, let’s get the conversation

on the topic of psychiatry going!

Vaccine Safety: Out of the Mouth of the FDA

It continues to upset me that I lost two friendships by making unbotrusive comments on facebook about the safety of vaccines, especially the new ones that are being churned out on a monthly basis – I have now gotten rid of crackbook/spybook/evilbook/____book.  The remarks I made were so benign – why did they strike such a nerve with people?  Were these individuals, who vaccinated themselves, in one case, and themselves and their children in another, already a little unsure about what they had just put into their bodies?  I am reminded again and again of the religious dogmatism that seems to surround this topic.  This blog got more traffic on the day of this post, and the comments that followed, than any other day so far.  Apparently, folks like a little drama! :lol:

Anyhow, here are some links from the FDA about all of the recent safety recalls of vaccines.  Are you going to call the FDA an organization of conspiracy?

June 1, Claris: “Contaminated” Vaccine

June 2, Sagent Pharms.: “Foreign Substance” in Vaccine

June 3, Pfizer: Injection Bags – Non-Sterility

June 3, West-Ward Pharms.: “Possible Health Risk”

That’s just for this Juneso far…we’re not even half-way through the month.

I am not a “crazy conspiracy theorist $^%&#”.  I am a medical researcher.  Just because I do not have a degree in medicine doesn’t mean I cannot be an “expert” in my own right about medical topics.  I happen to study the effects that medicine (particularly psychiatry, but other areas as well) has on society, rather than administering medicines.  Please tell me, how on earth does this make me any less knowledgable than the doctor or nurse holding that syringe in their latex-glove covered hand?  Do we fetishize medical doctors that muchStill?

I came quite close to withdrawing one of the comments to avoid losing a friend, but I refuse to not practice what I preach, even when it hurts, even when it hurts like hell.  I might as well throw in the towel if I’m going to do that.

I’m not going to throw in the towel.

Of course, the people I care about are going to be first to hear about some new knowledge I acquire if it affects them directly.  I wonder if this will continue to cause broken friendships.  I did not realize this would be a facet of my career.

Has anyone out there had a similar experience?  In any field, not necessarily medicine?